|
Palomar Starlux (IPL) and Treating
Acne Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light therapy using
wavelengths of 400-700 nm and 870-1200 nm for acne vulgaris March 18, 2006
www.rosacea-support.org
Aditya Gupta, MD, PhD, MBA,
Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences
Center (Sunnybrook site) and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON,
Canada; Mediprobe Research Inc, London, ON, Canada
Acne vulgaris results from accumulation
of sebum and Propionibacterium acnes bacteria in the pilosebaceous unit,
producing pustules, papules and cysts. Current acne therapies may
require ongoing applications or be associated with the potential for
severe side effects. Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy may provide a
faster, easier method of treating inflammatory acne, with a low risk of
side effects.
The Palomar LuxV handpiece provided IPL
wavelengths of 400 to 700 nm and 870 to 1200 nm in the treatment of 15
patients with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I to V. Each treatment used a
fluence of 11 J/cm2 with either 60- or 100-msec pulse width and 3 to 4
passes over the entire treatment area. Each patient received 3 to 5
treatment sessions at intervals of 1 to 2 weeks. A final follow-up took
place 3 months after completion of the last treatment.
Global severity grading, comedone
counts and papule/pustule counts were performed prior to each treatment.
The mean global severity grade of
acne at baseline was 3.1 (mild to
moderate acne: >20 noninflammatory comedones; 10-15 inflammatory
papules/pustules; may or may not be one small nodulocystic lesion). At
baseline, the mean comedone, papule, and pustule counts were 33.4, 19.3,
and 4.4, respectively. At final follow-up, the mean global severity
score was 2.3 (minimal to moderate: 10-20 noninflammatory comedones; <10
inflammatory papules/pustules; no nodulocystic lesions). Mean comedone,
papule and pustule counts were 17.4, 8.1 and 2.1, respectively. The
reduction from baseline in inflammatory lesions (sum of papules and
pustules) was significant (P = .0026), as was the reduction in global
severity score (P = .019). No significant difference in noninflammatory
lesion (comedone) counts was found. No significant adverse effects were
noted. Occasional flare-ups of inflammatory acne immediately after
treatment were reported, but resolved in 3 to 5 days without medical
intervention. There were reports in the skin type V group of mild
crusting associated with postinflammatory hyperpigmentation that
resolved without complications or medical intervention.
Based on these preliminary results,
IPL
is effective and safe in the treatment of the inflammatory lesions of
acne vulgaris in a variety of skin types. Larger scale trials to
confirmthe efficacy need to be performed, with higher numbers of
patients in each skin type, and longer follow-up to determine how long
benefits are maintained.
Author disclosure: Dr Gupta has been a
clinical investigator for and has received honoraria and research grants
from Palomar Medical Technologies. Supported in part by Palomar Medical
Technologies. |